Because the Huns were known for their ferocity the name “Hun” has been used as a slang term to signify someone who is barbaric and terrifying. The most common misuse of the term “Hun” is the labeling of German soldiers from World War I and II as “Huns”. Therefore this site is not about German soldiers but the original Hunnic people.
The Huns were horse warrior nomads of the Eurasian steppe and became well known for raiding in the 4th-6th centuries. The Huns were considered a barbarian, tribal people and their culture is discussed more in the “Hun Culture” section of this web site.
Of all the “barbarian” peoples to plague the Roman Empire, none were more feared than the Huns. They were considered demons- the forces of Gog and Magog, the scourge of God, signifying the end of the world. They were nightmares who could use magic in battle and appear out of nowhere. The psychological effects they had on their foes were terrifying. Chroniclers did not know who they were and so they made up stories of the Huns being the spawn of witches and the spirits of sand and wind. Jerome, a Roman scholar wrote of his experience with the Huns:
“Behold the Wolves, not of Arabia, but of the North, were let loose upon us from the far-off rocks of the Caucasus, and in a little while overran great provinces. How many monasteries were captured, how many streams were reddened with human blood!...Not even if I had a hundred tongues and a hundred mouths, and a voice of iron could I recount the name of every catastrophe...They filled the whole earth with slaughter and panic as they flitted hither and thither on their swift horses...They were at hand everywhere before they were expected: by their speed they outstripped rumor, and they took pity neither upon religion, nor rank nor age nor wailing childhood. Those who had just begun to live were compelled to die and, in ignorance of their plight, they would smile amid the drawn swords of the enemy...We ourselves were forced to make ships ready, to wait on the shore, to take precautions against the enemy’s arrival, to fear the barbarians more than shipwreck even though the winds were raging.”
But who were these people who inspired such fear into the powerful Roman Empire? The answer is more complex than bloodthirsty savages.
Very little is known about the origin of the Huns. The earliest literary source, Ammianus Marcellinus, claimed that they “dwelt beyond the Maeotic Sea near the frozen ocean”. The Maeotic Sea was the ancient name for the Sea of Azov. This places the Huns near the Black Sea in what is southern Russia today. Certainly there have been finds further east. The biggest controversy that has surrounded the topic of origin is if the Huns were descendants of the Hsiung-Nu from northern China. Since people have been arguing passionately back and forth on this subject for a couple hundred years, we do not intend to resolve it on this page. We will,however, discuss the evidence.
The controversy started when the 18th century scholar named de Guignes put forth the idea that the Huns were the descendants of the Hsiung-Nu, a “barbarian” people who lived on the border of the Chinese Empire for many centuries. His body of work was written in 1756-1758 and was so poorly documented that scholars have challenged his ideas ever since.
The very nature of the Hunnic Empire, (multi ethnic and multi-lingual) makes if difficult to force them into a specific category. Until recently, most scholars have sided against Guignes’s theory; but recently, new evidence supporting the Hsiung-Nu connection has come to light. Two texts from India and Tibet (the Tathagataguhya-sutra and the Lalitavistara) from 280 AD and 308 AD respectively, identify the Huns as Hsiung-Nu. A closer study of Central Asian empire histories that were either contemporary or predating the Hunnic Empire has also given insight to the subject. All of this new evidence is pointing towards the Huns and the Hsiung-Nu as either being one in the same or at least part of the Hsiung-Nu confederacy was an element in the new Hun Empire.